Susceptibilidad de enterobacterias a piperacilina/tazobactam en un hospital pediátrico de Chile / Enterobacteriaceae susceptibility to piperacillin/tazobactam in a Chilean pediatric hospital

Resumen Introducción: Las enterobacterias son bacilos gram-negativos responsables de infecciones graves en el ser humano. Se reporta una susceptibilidad en Klebsiella pneumoniae de 79,4% a piperacilina/tazobactam (PIP/TAZO) en hospitales pediátricos de Chile, pero según nuestro conocimiento, no existen datos publicados a la fecha respecto a la susceptibilidad de otras enterobacterias a PIP/TAZO en la población pediátrica chilena. Objetivo: Determinar la susceptibilidad in vitro a PIP/TAZO en cepas obtenidas de infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae en un hospital pediátrico de Chile. Material y Método: Estudio descriptivo y prospectivo de cepas de Enterobacteriaceae en Hospital de Niños Roberto del Río (HRRIO) entre 1 de enero de 2013 y el 27 de agosto de 2014. Se definió la susceptibilidad a PIP/TAZO por método de gradiente (E-test®) según puntos de corte CLSI 2014. Resultados: Se incluyeron 163 casos. El promedio de edad fue de 4 años 15 días. 70,6% de sexo femenino. El 79,7% de las cepas fueron aisladas en urocultivos. La susceptibilidad de Enterobacteriaceae a PIP/TAZO fue 95,1% (n = 155). La susceptibilidad intermedia fue 1,8% (n = 3). Discusión: Los aislados estudiados presentan alta susceptibilidad a PIP/TAZO. Este hallazgo puede explicarse por la baja circulación de microrganismos productores de BLEE y el limitado uso de PIP/TAZO en esta población pediátrica.

Introduction: Enterobacteriaceae are a group of gram-negative rods that can cause serious infections in humans. A susceptibility in Klebsiella pneumoniae of 79.4% to piperacillin/tazobactam (PIP/TAZO) is reported in pediatric hospitals in Chile. There is no published data published to date regarding PIP/TAZO susceptibility to other Enterobacteriaceae species in this population. Aim: To measure the in vitro PIP/TAZO susceptibility in Enterobacteriaceae isolates from patients in a pediatric hospital in Chile. Methods: Descriptive and prospective study of Enterobacteriaceae positive cultures from patients assisting to the "Hospital de niños Roberto del Río" (HRRIO) between January 2013 and August 2014. PIP/TAZO susceptibility was established by gradient diffusion method (E-test®) according to the 2014 CLSI standards. Results: 163 cases were included. The average age was 4 years and 15 days. 70.6% were female. 79.7% of samples were urine cultures. PIP/TAZO susceptibility in Enterobacteriaceae was 95.1% (n = 155). The intermediate susceptibility was 1.8% (n = 3). Discussion: The isolates studied present high susceptibility to PIP/TAZO. This finding could be explained by the fact that this population has not been exposed to this antimicrobial therapy and also the low rates for ESBL in pediatric infections.

Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Clinical Isolates of Bacteroides fragilis Group Organisms Recovered from 2009 to 2012 in a Korean Hospital

BACKGROUND: Periodic monitoring of antimicrobial resistance trends of clinically important anaerobic bacteria such as Bacteroides fragilis group organisms is required. We determined the antimicrobial susceptibilities of clinical isolates of B. fragilis group organisms recovered from 2009 to 2012 in a tertiary-care hospital in Korea. METHODS: A total of 180 nonduplicate clinical isolates of B. fragilis group organisms were collected in a tertiary care hospital. The species were identified by conventional methods: the ATB 32A rapid identification system (bioMerieux, France) and the Vitek MS matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (bioMerieux). Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined by the CLSI agar dilution method. RESULTS: Imipenem and meropenem resistance rates were 0-6% for B. fragilis group isolates. The rate of resistance to piperacillin-tazobactam was 2% for B. fragilis and 0% for other Bacteroides species, but 17% for B. thetaiotaomicron isolates. High resistance rates to piperacillin (72% and 69%), cefotetan (89% and 58%), and clindamycin (83% and 69%) were observed for B. thetaiotaomicron and other Bacteroides spp. The moxifloxacin resistance rate was 27% for other Bacteroides spp. The MIC50 and MIC90 of tigecycline were 2-4 microg/mL and 8-16 microg/mL, respectively. No isolates were resistant to chloramphenicol or metronidazole. CONCLUSIONS: Imipenem, meropenem, chloramphenicol, and metronidazole remain active against B. fragilis group isolates. Moxifloxacin and tigecycline resistance rates are 2-27% and 8-15% for B. fragilis group isolates, respectively.

Pharmacodynamic profiling of commonly prescribed antimicrobial drugs against Escherichia coli isolates from urinary tract

Since antimicrobial resistance among uropathogens against current first line agents has affected the management of severe urinary tract infection, we determined the likelihood that antibiotic regimens achieve bactericidal pharmacodynamic exposures using Monte Carlo simulation for five antimicrobials (ciprofloxacin, ceftriaxone, piperacillin/tazobactam, ertapenem, and meropenem) commonly prescribed as initial empirical treatment of inpatients with severe community acquired urinary tract infections. Minimum inhibitory concentration determination by Etest was performed for 205 Brazilian community urinary tract infection Escherichia coli strains from 2008 to 2012 and 74 E. coli bloodstream strains recovered from a surveillance study. Pharmacodynamic exposure was modeled via a 5000 subject Monte Carlo simulation. All isolates were susceptible to ertapenem and meropenem. Piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftriaxone and ciprofloxacin showed 100%, 97.5% and 83.3% susceptibility among outpatient isolates and 98.6%, 75.7% and 64.3% among inpatient isolates, respectively. Against outpatient isolates, all drugs except ciprofloxacin (82.7% in aggressive and 77.6% in conservative scenarios) achieved high cumulative fraction of response: car-bapenems and piperacillin/tazobactam cumulative fraction of responses were close to 100%, and ceftriaxone cumulative fraction of response was 97.5%. Similar results were observed against inpatients isolates for carbapenems (100%) and piperacillin/tazobactam (98.4%), whereas ceftriaxone achieved only 76.9% bactericidal cumulative fraction of response and ciprofloxacin 61.9% (aggressive scenario) and 56.7% (conservative scenario) respectively. Based on this model, standard doses of beta-lactams were predicted to deliver sufficient pharmacodynamic exposure for outpatients. However, ceftriaxone should be avoided for inpatients and ciprofloxacin empirical prescription should be avoided in both inpatients and outpatients with complicated urinary tract infection.

Capnocytophaga sputigena Bacteremia in a Patient with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

No abstract available.

In-Vitro Efficacy of Synergistic Antibiotic Combinations in Multidrug Resistant Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Strains

PURPOSE: Combination antibiotic treatment is preferred in nosocomial infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa). In vitro synergism tests were used to choose the combinations which might be used in clinic. The aim of this study was to investigate the synergistic efficacy of synergistic antibiotic combinations in multidrug resistant P. aeruginosa strains. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Synergistic efficacies of ceftazidime-tobramycin, piperacillin/tazobactam-tobramycin, imipenem-tobramycin, imipenem-isepamycin, imipenem-ciprofloxacin and ciprofloxacin-tobramycin combinations were investigated by checkerboard technique in 12 multiple-resistant and 13 susceptible P. aeruginosa strains. RESULTS: The ratios of synergy were observed in ceftazidime-tobramycin and piperacillin/tazobactam-tobramycin combinations as 67%, and 50%, respectively, in resistant strains, whereas synergy was not detected in other combinations. The ratios of synergy were observed in ceftazidime-tobramycin, piperacillin/tazobactam-tobramycin, imipenem-tobramycin, imipenem-ciprofloxacin and imipenem-isepamycin combinations as 31%, 46%, 15%, 8%, 8%, and respectively, in susceptible strains, whereas synergy was not detected in ciprofloxacin-tobramycin combination. Antagonism was not observed in any of the combinations. CONCLUSION: Although the synergistic ratios were high in combinations with ceftazidime or piperacillin/tazobactam and tobramycin, the concentrations in these combinations could not usually reach clinically available levels. Thus, the solution of the problems caused by multiple resistant P. aeruginosa should be based on the prevention of the development of resistance and spread of the causative agent between patients.

Comparison of in vitro activities of ceftazidime, piperacillin-tazobactam, and cefoperazone-sulbactam, and the implication on empirical therapy in patients with cancer.

Background: Infection is a common cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients. In most of these cases empirical treatment is provided because the focus of infection is not identified. Empiric antibiotics provided to these patients are based on isolates, sensitivity, and on guidelines. Here we have compared three antibiotics recommended as empirical treatment by the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA). Aims: To compare the three antibiotic sensitivities for gram negative isolates at our institute. Objective: To choose the optimal antibiotic as the empirical treatment for cancer patients developing infections. Materials and Methods: We collected the data on isolates and antibiotic sensitivity patterns of isolates for ceftazidime, piperacillin + tazobactum, and cefoperazone from the medical oncology department. We subsequently compared the sensitivity of these three antibiotics. Statistical Methods: The isolates were mapped using the WHONET 5.4 software. The analysis was conducted using SPSS 15.0 for Windows. McNemar Chi-square test was used to compare the sensitivity percentages between any two antibiotics. The agreement between the antibiotic and the gold standard was calculated using the Kappa statistic. Two tailed p values were reported. Results: The results showed that there was a difference among sensitivities for these antibiotics. It appears that the sensitivity of ceftazidime was inferior to the two other antibiotics. Also cefoperazone has better sensitivity as compared to piperacillin + tazobactum. Conclusion: In spite of these three antibiotics being recommended by IDSA our data suggest that it should not be followed blindly and local sensitivity data is important for formulating institutional guidelines for using antibiotics.

Resistance Trends of Bacteroides fragilis Group Over an 8-Year Period, 1997-2004, in Korea / 대한진단검사의학회지

BACKGROUND: Bacteroides fragilis group organisms are the most frequently isolated anaerobes in human infections. Increasing resistance to various antimicrobial agents is a significant problem in choosing appropriate antimicrobial agents to treat anaerobic infections. Periodic monitoring of the regional resistance trends of B. fragilis group isolates is needed. METHODS: A total of 466 nonduplicate clinical isolates of B. fragilis group organisms (276 B. fragilis, 106 Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, and 84 other B. fragilis group organisms) were collected during the 8-yr period from 1997 to 2004 in a Korean university hospital. Minimum inhibitory concentrations to various antimicrobial agents were determined by the CLSI agar dilution method. RESULTS: Eight isolates were resistant to imipenem. Additionally, the resistance rates to cefotetan were decreased in B. thetaiotaomicron, while those for clindamycin were significantly increased compared to the rates found in previous studies. Depending on species, resistance rates were 1-4% for imipenem, 1-6% for piperacillin-tazobactam, 4-11% for cefoxitin, 33-49% for piperacillin, 14-60% for cefotetan, and 51-76% for clindamycin. No isolates were resistant to chloramphenicol or metronidazole. CONCLUSIONS: Piperacillin-tazobactam, cefoxitin, imipenem, chloramphenicol, and metronidazole are still active against B. fragilis group isolates, while clindamycin no longer has a value as an empirical therapeutic agent in Korea. Furthermore, this study identified the first imipenem-resistant B. fragilis group isolates in Korea.

Evaluation of a modified double-disc synergy test for detection of extended spectrum beta-lactamases in AMPC beta-lactamase-producing proteus mirabilis.

The detection of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) in gram-negative bacteria that produce AmpC beta-lactamases is problematic. In the present study, the performance of modified double-disc synergy test (MDDST) that employs a combination of cefepime and piperacillin-tazobactam for the detection of Proteus mirabilis producing extended spectrum and AmpC beta-lactamases was evaluated and compared with double-disc synergy test (DDST) and NCCLS phenotypic disc confirmatory test (NCCLS-PDCT). A total of 90 clinical isolates of P. mirabilis , which met the CLSI (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute) screening criteria that these had broth microdilution (BMD) MIC of > or =2 mg/mL for at least one extended spectrum cephalosporin [ceftazidime (CAZ), cefotaxime (CTX) and cefpodoxime], were selected for the study. MDDST detected ESBLs in 40/90 of the isolates, whereas DDST detected ESBLs in only 25 isolates. NCCLS-PDCT could detect ESBLs in 39 isolates using CAZ and CAZ + clavulanic acid (CLA) combination, whereas CTX and CTX + CLA combination could detect only 37 isolates as ESBL positive. As many as 34/40 ESBL positive isolates were confirmed to be AmpC beta-lactamase positive by the modified three-dimensional test (MTDT). MDDST and NCCLS-PDCT could detect ESBLs in all the 34 AmpC positive isolates, whereas DDST could detect ESBLs in only 19 isolates. The study demonstrated that MDDST is superior to DDST and as sensitive as NCCLS-PDCT. However, MDDST seems to have enhanced potential for the detection of ESBLs in AmpC beta-lactamase-producing P. mirabilis .

Antibiotic combination as empirical therapy for extended spectrum beta-lactamase

extended spectrum beta-lactamase [ESBL] producing gram negative bacilli are becoming a growing problem worldwide with difficulties in designing a national formulary for empirical treatment of gram negative sepsis. In this study, we investigated the in vitro activity of Carbapenems, Pipracillin-Tazobactam, Ciprofloxacin alone or in combination with aminoglycosides against ESBL-producing strains isolated from clinical samples. Three hundred and one ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and K. pneumoniae strains isolated from clinical samples were investigated. Isolates were screened initially for ESBL production using an automated system. All ESBL isolates were further confirmed using the double-disk diffusion method. The overall Piperacillin-Tazobactam susceptibility was 57.9 [64.4% E. coli and 43.6% Klebsiella pneumoniae]. Only 29.6% of ESBLs [24.9% E. coli and 39.6% Klebsiella pneumoniae] were ciprofloxacin susceptible. 98.1% E. coli and 93.1% of Klebsiella pneumoniae were susceptible to Piperacillin-Tazobactam plus Amikacin combination. 73.7% E. coli and 61.4% of Klebsiella pneumoniae were susceptible to Piperacillin-Tazobactam plus Gentamicin combination. 96.7% E. coli and 91.1% of Klebsiella pneumoniae were susceptible to Ciprofloxacin plus Amikacin combination. 41.2% E. coli and 51.5% of Klebsiella pneumoniae were susceptible to Ciprofloxacin plus Gentamicin combination. ESBLs have high resistance profile against Piperacillin/Tazobactam and Ciprofloxacin. The ESBLs from Oman have similar resistantce pattern as those reported from UK and USA. This resistance decreases when these drugs are combined with Amikacin. All ESBLs are susceptible to Carbapenems. However, carbepenam overuse can lead to emergence of carbapenems resistant gram negative bacilli and ESBLs. Combination of Amikacin plus Piperacillin/Tazobactam is a feasible empirical therapy for ESBLs

Imipenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa : Risk Factors for Nosocomial Infections

The aim of this study was to determine the risk factors for nosocomial infections of imipenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (IRPA). A prospective case-control study was performed at a tertiary care hospital in Ankara from January to December 2004. The patients with nosocomial P. aeruginosa infection were included in the study. The features of the patients with IRPA infections were compared to those with imipenem-sensitive P. aeruginosa (ISPA) infections. Only the first isolation of P. aeruginosa was considered. Nosocomial infections were defined according to Center for Disease Control (CDC) criteria. IRPA was isolated from 75 (44.1%) patients, and ISPA was isolated from 95 (55.9%) patients during the study period. IRPA were most frequently isolated from endotracheal aspirate (19%) cultures (p= 0.048), whereas ISPA were most frequently isolated from urine (28%) cultures (p= 0.023). In multivariate analysis, a longer duration of hospital stay until P. aeruginosa isolation (odds ratio [OR], 1.027; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.002-1.054, p=0.034), arterial catheter administration (OR, 2.508; 95% CI, 1.062-5.920, p=0.036), vancomycin (OR, 2.882; 95% CI, 1.130-7.349, p=0.027), piperacillin-tazobactam (OR, 6.425; 95% CI, 2.187-18.875, p=0.001), and imipenem (OR, 3.580; 95% CI, 1.252- 10.245, p=0.017) treatment within the 14 days before isolation of IRPA were independently associated with imipenem resistance. It was concluded that treatment with imipenem, vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam were major risk factors for IRPA infections in hospitalized patients. The nosocomial occurrence of IRPA was also strongly related to the duration of hospital stay, arterial catheter administration.

Control of multi-resistant bacteria and ventilator-associated pneumonia: is it possible with changes in antibiotics?

Potent antimicrobial agents have been developed as a response to the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, which especially affect patients with prolonged hospitalization in Intensive Care Units (ICU) and who had been previously treated with antimicrobials, especially third-generation cephalosporins.This study was to determine how changes in the empirical treatment of infections in ICU patients affect the incidence of Gram-negative bacteria species and their susceptibility to antimicrobials, and examine the impact of these changes on nosocomial infections. A prospective interventional study was performed in a university hospital during two periods: 1) First period (September 1999 to February 2000); and 2) Second period (August 2000 to December 2000); empirical treatment was changed from ceftriaxone and/or ceftazidime in the first period to piperacillin/tazobactam in the second. ICU epidemiological and infection control rates, as well as bacterial isolates from upper airways were analyzed. Ceftazidime consumption dropped from 34.83 to 0.85 DDD/1000 patients per day (p=0.004). Piperacillin/tazobactam was originally not available; its consumption reached 157.07 DDD/1000 patients per day in the second period (p=0.0002). Eighty-seven patients and 66 patients were evaluated for upper airway colonization in the first and second periods, respectively. There was a significant decrease in the incidence of K. pneumoniae (p=0.004) and P. mirabilis (p=0.036), restoration of K. pneumoniae susceptibility to cephalosporins (p<0.0001) and reduction of ventilator-associated pneumonia rates (p<0.0001). However, there was an increase in P. aeruginosa incidence (p=0.005) and increases in ceftazidime (p=0.003) and meropenem (p<0.0001) susceptibilities. Changing antimicrobial selective pressure on multi-resistant Gram-negative bacteria helps control ventilator-associated pneumonia and decreases antimicrobial resistance.

Sensitivity pattern of gram negative bacilli to three beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations using the automated API system.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the spectrum of activity of three beta-lactamase inhibitors such as amoxicillin/ clavulanic acid, ticarcillin/ clavulanic acid and piperacillin/ tazobactam in comparison to cephalosporins against gram negative bacilli. METHODS: Gram-negative bacilli isolated from the clinical specimens received in the laboratory were included in the study. Using the API system (bioMiotarieux) during a one-year period, a total of 1,252 Enterobacteriaceae and 385 non-fermenters were evaluated. RESULTS: The percentage resistance of the Enterobacteriaceae isolates was 82.92% to amoxicillin/ clavulanic acid, 58.22% to ticarcillin/clavulanic acid and 22.44% to piperacillin/tazobactam respectively. Pseudomonas aeruginosa showed resistance of 96% to ticarcillin/ clavulanic acid and 61% to piperacillin/ tazobactam and Acinetobacter baumannii showed 49% resistance to ticarcillin/ clavulanic acid and 77% resistance to piperacillin/ tazobactam respectively. The isolates exhibited high resistance to all the generations of cephalosporins and the other groups of antibiotics except carbapenems. CONCLUSIONS: Piperacillin/tazobactam was found to be the most active combination of the three against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas spp. and ticarcillin/clavulanic acid against Acinetobacter spp. and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.

Aislamientos microbiológicos en el Hospital Patrocinio Peñuela Ruíz: Estado Táchira 2005 / Microbiological isolation in the Hospital Patrocinio Peñuela Ruíz: Tachira State 2005

El cultivo de microorganismos es un proceso que permite el aislamiento de los gérmenes causantes o asociados a una infección. Con el aislamiento del germen no solamente se documenta el agente etiológico, sino que éste se tiene disponible para realizar pruebas de tipificación, determinación de sensibilidad a antibióticos y capacidad bactericida de líquidos corporales. En el Hospital Patrocinio Peñuela Ruíz, durante el año 2005, se realizaron 850 aislamientos microbiológicos, por lo que se plantea realizar una investigación de tipo transversal, retrospectivo, descriptivo y observacional, que tiene como objetivo determinar la prevalencia de los microorganismos aislados, a través de los cultivos secreciones, durante enero-diciembre 2005. Los principales resultados son que el mayor porcentaje (50,42) fue realizado en mujeres. La tendencia a realizar toma de muestra para aislamiento microbiológico es en los extremos de la vida, con un 23,05 por ciento en las personas mayores de 60 años y un 11,16 por ciento en los menores de 12 años. El 43,17 por ciento resultaron positivos para algún microorganismo aislado. El principal microorganismo aislado por servicio y otros departamentos fue: en pediatría Staphylococcus aureus (8.03 por ciento), en la Emergencia pediátrica Staphylococcus aureus (8.33 por ciento). En Medicina Interna Staphylococcus aureus 11,73 por ciento, en la Emergencia de Adultos staphylococcus aureus 18,07 por ciento, en Traumatología pseudomona aeurinosa y el staphylococcus aureos con 7,69 por ciento cada una. En Cirugía pseudomona aeruginosa (17,05 por ciento), en gineco-obstetricia e.coli (23,53 por ciento), y para terminar, en la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos, Pseudomona aeruginosa 15,97 por ciento. También gracias a esta investigación, se pudo determinar la sensibilidad o resistencia antibiótica de los principales microorganismos aislados.

The immunomodulatory effect of antibiotics on the secretion of tumour necrosis factor alpha by peripheral blood mononuclear cells in response to Stenotrophomonas maltophilia stimulation / Efecto inmunomodulatorio de los antibióticos sobre la secreción del factor de necrosis tumoral alfa por células sanguíneas mononucleares periféricas en respuesta a la estimulación de stenotrophomonas maltophilia

Some antibiotics have been shown to modify the host immune response. Infection with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, is often difficult to treat due to multiresistance to antibiotics. The authors examined the effect of four commonly used antimicrobial agents (ciprofloxacin, ceftazidime, cotrimoxazole and piperacillin-tazobactam) on tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha) production by human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) stimulated with heat-killed S maltophilia. Cotrimoxazole was the only antibiotic that suppressed TNFa secretion at clinically achievable concentrations. This may explain its use with good effect in the treatment of S maltophilia infections. However at supratherapeutic concentrations, ceftazidime and ciprofloxacin, but not piperacillin-tazobactam, also inhibited significantly the production of TNF alpha. Cotrimoxazole, in addition to its antimicrobial effect against S maltophilia, has an immunomodulatory effect on peripheral blood mononuclear cells stimulated by S maltophilia.

Algunos antibióticos han mostrado ser capaces de modificar la respuesta inmune del huésped. Las infecciones con Stenotrophomonas maltophilia – un patógeno emergente – son difíciles de tratar debido a su multiresistencia a los antibióticos. Examinamos el efecto de cuatro agentes antimicrobianos comúnmente usados (ciprofloxacina, ceftazidima, cotrimoxazol, y piperacilina-tazobactam) sobre la producción del factor de necrosis tumoral alfa (FNTa) por las células sanguíneas mononucleares periféricas humanas (PBMC) estimuladas con S maltophilia inactivadas mediante calor. El cotrimoxazol – en concentraciones clínicamente posibles – fue el único antibiótico que eliminó la secreción FNTa. Esto puede explicar su uso efectivo en el tratamiento de las infecciones por S maltophilia. Sin embargo, en concentraciones supraterapéuticas, la ceftazidima y la cipro-floxacina – pero no la piperacilina-tazobactam – también inhibieron significativamente la producción de FNTa. El cotrimoxazol, además de su efecto antimicrobiano contra S maltophilia, tiene un efecto inmuno-modulatorio sobre las células sanguíneas mononucleares periféricas estimuladas por S maltophilia.

Comparative in vitro activity of beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations against gram negative bacteria.

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Currently, the use of beta-lactamase inhibitors in combination with beta-lactam antibiotics represents an effective measure to combat a specific resistance mechanism of beta-lactamase producing organisms. Knowledge about the susceptibility profile of bacteria to different combination agents available is essential to guide appropriate treatment of severe infections in hospitalized patients. The present study compares the in vitro activity of three commercially available beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations (piperacillin/tazobactam, cefoperazone/sulbactam, ticarcillin/clavulanic acid) against beta-lactamase producing gram negative bacteria in a tertiary care hospital in north India. METHODS: A total of 9004 consecutively isolated extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing gram negative bacteria isolated from various clinical samples from patients admitted to the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, from September 2003 to August 2004 were included in the study. These isolates were screened for ESBL production by the inhibitor based test recommended by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS). Antibiotic susceptibility testing was carried out by disc diffusion method as per NCCLS guidelines. RESULTS: Of the 9004 isolates tested, 3232 (35.89%) were sensitive and 568 (6.31%) were resistant to all three combination agents, and rest 5204 (57.80%) were resistant to at least one of the combinations. Susceptibility to piperacillin/tazobactam, cefoperazone/sulbactam, and ticarcillin/clavulanic acid was 81.37, 76.06 and 45.48 per cent respectively. Piperacillin/tazobactam exhibited significantly (P<0.05) greater antimicrobial activity against Pseudomonas spp., Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. compared to cefoperazone/sulbactam. INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSION: Overall piperacillin/tazobactam was observed to be the best combination agent followed by cefoperazone/sulbactam in our setting. This difference in activities of these combination agents needs to be evaluated further by ascertaining their efficacy in clinical studies.

Susceptibilidad antimicrobiana de cepas de Pseudomonas aeruginosa aisladas en el laboratorio del Hospital Regional Dr. Leonardo Guzmán de Antofagasta, Chile / In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated at Hospital Dr. Leonardo Guzmán, Antofagasta, Chile

Pseudomonas aeruginosa es un patógeno nosocomial frecuente que presenta elevada resistencia a los antimicrobianos y causa infecciones graves cuando hay alteración de los mecanismos defensivos del paciente. Así, conocer los patrones locales de sensibilidad es importante para la elección del tratamiento antimicrobiano adecuado en cada institución. En este trabajo determinamos la susceptibilidad antimicrobiana de cepas de P. aeruginosa aisladas desde pacientes atendidos en el Hospital Regional de Antofagasta. La mayoría de los pacientes tenía alguna condición predisponente a la infección y 48% tenía una infección grave. Las cepas mostraron mayor resistencia a los antimicrobianos que lo reportado en trabajos nacionales previos. Las cepas fueron altamente resistentes a amikacina (36,8%), ceftazidima (36,8%) y ciprofloxacina (68,4%), moderadamente resistentes a imipenem (26,3%), mientras que eran escasamente resistentes a piperacilina/tazobactam (5,3%) y cefoperazona/sulbactam (15,8%), Este es el primer trabajo, realizado en nuestra región, que estudia la susceptibilidad de P. aeruginosa frente a distintos grupos de antimicrobianos utilizados en clínica.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a nosocomial pathogen that often displays a high degree of antibiotic resistance. This pathogen causes also serious infections specially in patients with severe diseases or immunodeficiency. To offer the best treatment in every institution it is necessary to know the local pattern of antimicrobial susceptibility, then we studied the antibiotic susceptibility of P. aeruginosa strains isolated from patients attended in the Regional Hospital of Antofagasta. Most of them had an underlying disease that predisposed them to the infection and 48% had a severe infection. The strains showed higher drug resistance than that reported by other chilean researchers. P. aeruginosa displayed high resistance to amikacin (36,8%), ceftazidime (36,8%) and ciprofloxacin (68,4%) intermediate resistance to imipenem (26,3%), but low resistance to piperacillin/tazobactam (5,3%) and cefoperazone/sulbactam (15,8%). This is the first drug susceptibility study conducted in the Second Region of Chile, where P. aeruginosa was assayed against those antibiotics used in the clinical practice.

Antibacterial activity of tazocin TM [piperacillin/trazobactam] against 1296 clinical isolates from a tertiary care center

The antibacterial activity of the recently developed Beta-lactamase inhibitor tazobactam with and without piperacillin was studied in recent clinical isolates from patients at a tertiary care center. Although tazobactam by itself had little or no antibacterial activity, the combination with piperacillin was highly effective against piperacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococci. It was also significantly more inhibitory than piperacillin towards almost all members of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa tested. The activity was compared with another commercially available combination of penicillin [amoxicillin and Beta-lactamase inhibitor, clavulanic acid], and other drugs commonly used in clinical practice